The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스가능덤프문제 & CNSP최고덤프데모

CNSP인증시험은The SecOps Group인증시험중의 하나입니다.그리고 또한 비중이 아주 큰 인증시험입니다. 그리고The SecOps Group CNSP인증시험 패스는 진짜 어렵다고 합니다. 우리Itexamdump에서는 여러분이CNSP인증시험을 편리하게 응시하도록 전문적이 연구팀에서 만들어낸 최고의CNSP덤프를 제공합니다, Itexamdump와 만남으로 여러분은 아주 간편하게 어려운 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다,

The SecOps Group인증CNSP시험을 패스하기가 어렵다고 하면 합습가이드를 선택하여 간단히 통과하실 수 잇습니다. 우리Itexamdump에서는 무조건 여러분을 위하여 관연 자료덤프 즉 문제와 답을 만들어낼 것입니다. 우리덤프로The SecOps Group인증CNSP시험준비를 잘하시면 100%The SecOps Group인증CNSP시험을 패스할 수 있습니다. Itexamdump덤프로 여러분은The SecOps Group인증CNSP시험을 패스는 물론 여러분의 귀증한 간도 절약하실 수 있습니다.

>> The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 <<

퍼펙트한 CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 덤프자료

요즘같이 시간인즉 금이라는 시대에 시간도 절약하고 빠른 시일 내에 학습할 수 있는 Itexamdump의 덤프를 추천합니다. 귀중한 시간절약은 물론이고 한번에The SecOps Group CNSP인증시험을 패스함으로 여러분의 발전공간을 넓혀줍니다.

최신 Security Practitioner CNSP 무료샘플문제 (Q15-Q20):

질문 # 15
Which command will perform a DNS zone transfer of the domain "victim.com" from the nameserver at 10.0.0.1?

A. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axrfr
B. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axfr
C. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com arfxr
D. dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com afxr

정답：B

설명：
A DNS zone transfer replicates an entire DNS zone (a collection of DNS records for a domain) from a primary nameserver to a secondary one, typically for redundancy or load balancing. The AXFR (Authoritative Full Zone Transfer) query type, defined in RFC 1035, facilitates this process. The dig (Domain Information Groper) tool, a staple in Linux/Unix environments, is used to query DNS servers. The correct syntax is:
dig @<nameserver> <domain> axfr
Here, dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axfr instructs dig to request a zone transfer for "victim.com" from the nameserver at 10.0.0.1. The @ symbol specifies the target server, overriding the system's default resolver.
Technical Details:
The AXFR query is sent over TCP (port 53), not UDP, due to the potentially large size of zone data, which exceeds UDP's typical 512-byte limit (pre-EDNS0).
Successful execution requires the nameserver to permit zone transfers from the querying IP, often restricted to trusted secondaries via Access Control Lists (ACLs) for security. If restricted, the server responds with a "REFUSED" error.
Security Implications: Zone transfers expose all DNS records (e.g., A, MX, NS), making them a reconnaissance goldmine for attackers if misconfigured. CNSP likely emphasizes securing DNS servers against unauthorized AXFR requests, using tools like dig to test vulnerabilities.
Why other options are incorrect:
A . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com axrfr: "axrfr" is a typographical error. The correct query type is "axfr." Executing this would result in a syntax error or an unrecognized query type response from dig.
B . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com afxr: "afxr" is another typo, not a valid DNS query type per RFC 1035. dig would fail to interpret this, likely outputting an error like "unknown query type." C . dig @10.0.0.1 victim.com arfxr: "arfxr" is also invalid, a jumbled version of "axfr." It holds no meaning in DNS protocol standards and would fail similarly.
Real-World Context: Penetration testers use dig ... axfr to identify misconfigured DNS servers. For example, dig @ns1.example.com example.com axfr might reveal subdomains or internal IPs if not locked down.

질문 # 16
In a Linux-based architecture, what does the /mnt directory contain?

A. System files which represent the current state of the kernel
B. Temporary-mounted filesystems
C. System configuration files and initialization scripts
D. Loadable driver modules needed to boot the system

정답：B

설명：
The Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS), per FHS 3.0, defines directory purposes:
/mnt: Designated for temporarily mounted filesystems, typically by system administrators.
Use: Mount points for removable media (e.g., USB drives: mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/usb) or network shares (e.g., NFS).
Nature: Transient, user-managed, not persistent across reboots (unlike /etc/fstab mounts).
Contrast:
/media: Auto-mounts removable devices (e.g., by desktop environments like GNOME).
/mnt vs. /media: /mnt is manual, /media is system-driven.
Technical Details:
Empty by default; subdirectories (e.g., /mnt/usb) are created as needed.
Permissions: Typically root-owned (0755), requiring sudo for mounts.
Security Implications: Misconfigured /mnt mounts (e.g., world-writable) risk unauthorized access. CNSP likely covers mount security (e.g., nosuid option).
Why other options are incorrect:
B . System config/init scripts: Found in /etc (e.g., /etc/passwd, /etc/init.d).
C . Driver modules: Located in /lib/modules/<kernel-version>.
D . Kernel state: Resides in /proc (e.g., /proc/cpuinfo).
Real-World Context: Admins mount ISOs at /mnt during server provisioning (e.g., mount -o loop image.iso /mnt).

질문 # 17
Which of the following files has the SGID permission set?
-rwxr-sr-x 1 root root 4096 Jan 1 08:00 myfile
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Jan 1 00:08 myprogram
-rw-r--r-s 1 root root 4896 Jan 1 00:00 anotherfile

A. myprogram
B. All of the above
C. anotherfile
D. myfile

정답：D

설명：
In Linux, the SGID (Set Group ID) bit alters execution or directory behavior:
On executables: Runs with the group owner's permissions (e.g., s in group execute position).
On directories: New files inherit the directory's group ownership.
Notation: s in group execute field (e.g., -rwxr-sr-x), or S if no execute (e.g., -rwxr-Sr-x).
Analysis:
-rwxr-sr-x (myfile): User: rwx, Group: r-s (SGID), Others: r-x. The s in group execute confirms SGID.
-rwsr-xr-x (myprogram): User: rws (SUID), Group: r-x, Others: r-x. The s is in user execute, not group-no SGID.
-rw-r--r-s (anotherfile): User: rw-, Group: r--, Others: r-s. The s is in others execute, but no x exists, rendering it meaningless (not SGID; could be a typo or sticky bit misapplied).
Security Implications: SGID executables (e.g., /usr/bin/wall) or directories (e.g., /var/local) manage group access. Misuse risks privilege escalation. CNSP likely teaches auditing with find / -perm -g=s.
Why other options are incorrect:
B: SUID, not SGID.
C: No valid SGID; s in others is irrelevant without execute.
D: Only A has SGID.
Real-World Context: SGID on /var/mail ensures mail files inherit the mail group.

질문 # 18
How would you establish a null session to a Windows host from a Windows command prompt?

A. net use hostnamec$ "" /u:NULL
B. net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:""
C. net use hostnamec$ "" /u:""
D. net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:NULL

정답：B

설명：
A null session in Windows is an unauthenticated connection to certain administrative shares, historically used for system enumeration. The net use command connects to a share, and the IPC$ (Inter-Process Communication) share is the standard target for null sessions, allowing access without credentials when configured to permit it.
Why C is correct: The command net use hostnameipc$ "" /u:"" specifies the IPC$ share and uses empty strings for the password (first "") and username (/u:""), establishing a null session. This syntax is correct for older Windows systems (e.g., XP or 2003) where null sessions were more permissive, a topic covered in CNSP for legacy system vulnerabilities.
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Targets the c$ share (not typically used for null sessions) and uses /u:NULL, which is invalid syntax; the username must be an empty string ("").
B: Targets c$ instead of ipc$, making it incorrect for null session establishment.
D: Uses ipc$ correctly but specifies /u:NULL, which is not the proper way to denote an empty username.

질문 # 19
Which of the following protocols is not vulnerable to address spoofing attacks if implemented correctly?

A. IP
B. TCP
C. UDP
D. ARP

정답：B

설명：
Address spoofing fakes a source address (e.g., IP, MAC) to impersonate or amplify attacks. Analyzing protocol resilience:
C . TCP (Transmission Control Protocol):
Mechanism: Three-way handshake (SYN, SYN-ACK, ACK) verifies both endpoints.
Client SYN (Seq=X), Server SYN-ACK (Seq=Y, Ack=X+1), Client ACK (Ack=Y+1).
Spoofing Resistance: Spoofer must predict the server's sequence number (randomized in modern stacks) and receive SYN-ACK, impractical without session hijacking or MITM.
Correct Implementation: RFC 793-compliant, with anti-spoofing (e.g., Linux tcp_syncookies).
A . UDP:
Connectionless (RFC 768), no handshake. Spoofed packets (e.g., source IP 1.2.3.4) are accepted if port is open, enabling reflection attacks (e.g., DNS amplification).
B . ARP (Address Resolution Protocol):
No authentication (RFC 826). Spoofed ARP replies (e.g., fake MAC for gateway IP) poison caches, enabling MITM (e.g., arpspoof).
D . IP:
No inherent validation at Layer 3 (RFC 791). Spoofed source IPs pass unless filtered (e.g., ingress filtering, RFC 2827).
Security Implications: TCP's handshake makes spoofing harder, though not impossible (e.g., blind spoofing with sequence prediction, mitigated since BSD 4.4). CNSP likely contrasts this with UDP/IP's vulnerabilities in DDoS contexts.
Why other options are incorrect:
A, B, D: Lack handshake or authentication, inherently spoofable.
Real-World Context: TCP spoofing was viable pre-1990s (e.g., Mitnick attack); modern randomization thwarts it.

질문 # 20
......

성공을 위해 길을 찾고 실패를 위해 구실을 찾지 않는다는 말이 있습니다. The SecOps Group인증 CNSP시험이 영어로 출제되어 시험패스가 너무 어렵다 혹은 회사다니느라 공부할 시간이 없다는 등등은 모두 공부하기싫은 구실에 불과합니다. Itexamdump의 The SecOps Group인증 CNSP덤프만 마련하면 실패를 성공으로 바꿀수 있는 기적을 체험할수 있습니다.

CNSP최고덤프데모: https://www.itexamdump.com/CNSP.html

It 업계 중 많은 분들이 인증시험에 관심이 많은 인사들이 많습니다.it산업 중 더 큰 발전을 위하여 많은 분들이The SecOps Group CNSP를 선택하였습니다.인증시험은 패스를 하여야 자격증취득이 가능합니다.그리고 무엇보다도 통행증을 받을 수 잇습니다.The SecOps Group CNSP은 그만큼 아주 어려운 시험입니다, The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 단기간에 시험패스의 기적을 가져다드리는것을 약속합니다, The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 덤프무료샘플 문제 다운가능, Itexamdump의 The SecOps Group인증 CNSP시험덤프는 고객님의 IT자격증을 취득하는 꿈을 실현시켜 드리는 시험패스의 지름길입니다, The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 소프트웨어버전까지 필요하신 분은 PDF버전을 구입하실때 공동구매하셔야 합니다.

너도 여자야, 휘몰아치는 살생의 욕구를 억누르느라, 반대쪽 손이 부르르CNSP떨리고 있었다, It 업계 중 많은 분들이 인증시험에 관심이 많은 인사들이 많습니다.it산업 중 더 큰 발전을 위하여 많은 분들이The SecOps Group CNSP를 선택하였습니다.인증시험은 패스를 하여야 자격증취득이 가능합니다.그리고 무엇보다도 통행증을 받을 수 잇습니다.The SecOps Group CNSP은 그만큼 아주 어려운 시험입니다.

시험패스에 유효한 CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 덤프데모 다운

단기간에 시험패스의 기적을 가져다드리는것을 약속합니다, 덤프무료샘플 문제 다운가능, Itexamdump의 The SecOps Group인증 CNSP시험덤프는 고객님의 IT자격증을 취득하는 꿈을 실현시켜 드리는 시험패스의 지름길입니다.

소프트웨어버전까지 필요하신 분은 PDF버전을 구입하실때 공동구매하셔야 합니다.

Blog

Tony Fisher Tony Fisher

Biography

The SecOps Group CNSP시험패스가능덤프문제 & CNSP최고덤프데모

퍼펙트한 CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 덤프자료

최신 Security Practitioner CNSP 무료샘플문제 (Q15-Q20):

시험패스에 유효한 CNSP시험패스 가능 덤프문제 덤프데모 다운